Photo by Speshulkay, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia CommonsI was at 91%. That was wrong.
Knicks 114, Hawks 98. A 24-point halftime deficit. McCollum went 0-for-4 from three. The Hawks shot 37% from the field. It was ugly. I'm not going to pretend otherwise.
I'm at 76%.
Now let me tell you why that number isn't lower.
Everyone on your timeline is screaming that the Hawks are finished. That Game 4 exposed them. That the magic is over. Here's what Game 4 actually exposed: the Knicks are a 3-seed, and sometimes 3-seeds win on the road by 16 points. That's not a revelation. That's a seed line doing its job.
You know what IS a revelation? A 6-seed being tied 2-2 in a series they were supposed to lose in five.
The Hawks already won at MSG. Game 2. McCollum dropped 32, the Hawks erased a 12-point fourth-quarter deficit, and outscored the Knicks 28-15 in the final frame. New York shot 5-for-22 in that quarter. The Garden went silent. That happened. One blowout doesn't un-happen it.
McCollum had 17 last night on 0-for-4 from deep. His worst game of the series. But the man is still averaging 24.5 points per game across four games with game-winning shots in Games 2 and 3. One containment game doesn't erase back-to-back daggers. It means the Knicks finally found an answer for one night. The question is whether they can sustain it.
Here's the part nobody panicking wants to hear: the Hawks shot 37% in Game 4. They shot 48% or better in Games 2 and 3. One bad shooting night against a desperate Knicks team that knew it had to land a punch isn't a trend. It's an outlier. If the Hawks shoot 37% again in Game 5, I'll worry. Until then, it's noise.
I dropped 15 points. That's the maximum my system allows, and I used every one of them. But I dropped to 76, not 50. Not 60. Seventy-six.
Because the math hasn't changed. The Knicks' three best players all played well in Games 2 and 3 and still lost both. Brunson, KAT, and Anunoby combined for quality performances and the Knicks couldn't close either game. That structural problem doesn't disappear because they won a road blowout.
Game 5 is Tuesday at MSG. The Hawks have already proven they can win there. McCollum has already proven he hits the shots that matter. The series is 2-2 and this team is a 6-seed that half the country picked to lose in four.
They're not behind. They're exactly where a team with this much fight should be.
76%. I'll eat the L on the 91. But I'm not panicking. And if you are, bookmark this.
Come back Wednesday.
The Tilt
A 6-seed going 2-2 against a 3-seed on the road is ahead of schedule, not behind it. The panic says more about your expectations than the Hawks' trajectory.
— Dex Ponce
What's your take?
Keep Reading

Everybody Kept Their Old Job
The Hawks handed the College Park Skyhawks a new general manager, a new head coach and a first-ever associate head coach on Wednesday, and none of the three gave up the job they already had in Atlanta. Two of them used to play there.

Nobody Else in the Sentence
Yesterday I asked whether anyone would ever describe this Hawks team without naming another franchise to finish the sentence. It took one night, and the answer came from a player who has not practiced here yet, in a gym in Quebec City, in nouns nobody writing previews has access to.

Built Against Somebody
The national previews have landed and Atlanta's sentence for the season is that the Hawks built an anti-Knicks roster. It is meant as a compliment. It is also one more year of being described in relation to somebody else.