Ellis Magnolia: Forty-Two Wins and a Run Differential That Says You're Selling Them ShortPhoto by Thomson200 / Wikimedia Commons (CC0 1.0 Public Domain)
Braves

Ellis Magnolia: Forty-Two Wins and a Run Differential That Says You're Selling Them Short

John Smoltz says the real Braves are 'somewhere in the middle.' The Pythagorean theorem says they should be even better than 42-20.

Ellis MagnoliaJun 4, 2026 · 4 min read

Forty-three and nineteen.

That is the record the Braves should have, according to the formula Bill James devised forty years ago to estimate how many games a team deserves to win based on runs scored and runs allowed. The Pythagorean expectation takes 327 runs scored and 213 allowed, applies an exponent, and returns a verdict: this team has been slightly unlucky.

The actual record is 42-20, the best in baseball. And the interesting thing about 42-20 is not that it's impressive. It's that it's modest.

John Smoltz offered his assessment last week. The 2025 team went 76-86 after an 0-7 start. The 2026 team is on a 110-win pace. "Somewhere in the middle," Smoltz said, "is what the Atlanta Braves can be."

It is a reasonable thing to say. It is also, by the available evidence, wrong.

The Pythagorean record is not a projection. It is a description -- a way of measuring whether the outcomes match the underlying performance. A team that wins more games than its run differential suggests is riding luck in close games. A team that wins fewer is leaving wins on the field. The Braves, at 42-20 against a Pythagorean expectation of 43-19, are the second kind. The plus-114 run differential -- 1.84 runs per game of average margin -- describes a team that has been slightly better than its record indicates.

This is not the profile of a hot streak. Hot streaks show the opposite signature: teams winning games their run differential cannot support, close games breaking their way. The 2026 Braves are winning by enough to deserve more wins than they have. The math says 42-20 is the floor, not the ceiling.

Smoltz's instinct to find the middle is understandable. Fourteen consecutive division titles from 1991 to 2005 produced a single World Series ring. The 2023 team won 104 games and was eliminated in four NLDS contests. If you've watched this franchise long enough, caution is not pessimism -- it's pattern recognition.

But the Pythagorean formula doesn't care about franchise history. It cares about runs.

Tuesday night at Truist Park offered a fair sample. Grant Holmes -- who spent a decade in the minor leagues before finding a rotation spot this season -- threw six innings of two-run ball on 85 pitches. Competent, economical. Patrick Corbin, who has now lost to the Braves twelve consecutive times, allowed four earned runs in five. Twelve is twelve.

The offense distributed the damage. Mauricio Dubon hit a three-run homer to center in the third -- 405 feet, the sort of distance that ends conversations. Ozzie Albies hit another three-run homer to left in the seventh -- 393 feet, insurance that rendered the final two innings academic. Six of the Braves' seven runs came on two swings. The other came on a Ha-Seong Kim single, a reminder that even a hitter batting .089 occasionally makes contact.

Seven runs scored. Three runs allowed. The Pythagorean expectation climbed another fraction of a win ahead of reality.

What makes the Smoltz framework insufficient is not that it's wrong about the extremes. It's that "somewhere in the middle" implies regression from the current position, and the numbers suggest the opposite. Forty-two wins in 62 games projects to 109.7 over a full season. But the Pythagorean pace -- 43 wins in 62 -- projects to 112.5. The gap is roughly three wins over a full season. Three wins is the difference between a historically great regular season and one that merely leads baseball.

And then there is the variable that hasn't yet been introduced.

Drake Baldwin -- the reigning NL Rookie of the Year, hitting .303 with 13 home runs and a .932 OPS when a Grade 1 oblique strain sent him to the injured list on May 18 -- is expected back during the June 16-21 homestand. The Braves have gone 8-4 without him. They've compiled 42-20 without their best offensive catcher and, for significant stretches, without Ronald Acuna Jr. at anything resembling his ceiling.

The Pythagorean formula has no mechanism for accounting for a .932 OPS returning to a lineup that already outscores opponents by nearly two runs a game. That variable exists outside the model, and it points in only one direction.

One hundred games remain. Pitching staffs tire. The schedule gets harder -- the Mets series June 12-14 will be the first real test against a contender in weeks. But regression has to overcome a gap that currently favors the Braves, not close one that flatters them. A team whose underlying performance exceeds its record is not a team waiting to fall back to earth.

Smoltz said somewhere in the middle. The run differential said 42-20. The Pythagorean record said 43-19. The Baldwin timeline says both of those numbers were compiled without the NL Rookie of the Year in the lineup.

They should be better. They might be about to be.

The Tilt

The Braves aren't overperforming at 42-20 -- their run differential says they're actually leaving wins on the table, and Baldwin hasn't come back yet.

Ellis Magnolia

What's your take?

Share
EM

Ellis Magnolia

Numbers & narrative — statistical depth worn lightly, literary pacing.